Facing DUI charges without clear evidence of driving is a frustrating and surprisingly common experience in Indiana. Many people find themselves accused of operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OVWI), even when the evidence is circumstantial or weak. Scenarios often involve disputes over who was driving or assumptions based on limited facts, like a car crash and injuries that might imply operation. Despite the lack of definitive proof, charges can still be filed, making it critical to understand Indiana’s legal standards and the importance of having an experienced attorney to challenge these cases. The burden of proof lies with the State, which must show beyond a reasonable doubt that you were operating the vehicle—a standard that, in practice, can sometimes be applied loosely in DUI cases.
Indiana’s Rules of Evidence allow for the inclusion of weak or circumstantial evidence if it is deemed relevant, complicating the defense in DUI cases. This highlights the importance of securing an attorney who understands how to analyze and challenge such evidence effectively.
